In Atomfall, the Core i5-4460T is slightly faster than the Core i3-3227U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4460T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 196 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Mar 01, 2014 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4460T vs Core i3-3227U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4460T vs Core i3-3227U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4460T vs Core i3-3227U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4460T
Mar 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4460T Mar 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
