In Deathloop, the Core i5-430M is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-430M
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 35 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-430M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
224 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
99%
Price, $
$1629.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-430M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1652
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
13962
100%
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-430M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
2.534 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-430M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | TRX4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
