In Deathloop, the Core i5-430M is slightly faster than the Core i3-8100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-430M
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-8100
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-430M vs Core i3-8100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-430M vs Core i3-8100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-430M vs Core i3-8100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.534 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-430M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $117.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
