In Atomfall, the Core i5-4300M is slower than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4300M vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4300M vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4300M vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4300M
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4300M Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 5000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
