In Atomfall, the Core i5-4288U is slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4288U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 233 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4288U vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4288U vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4288U vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4288U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4288U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1700 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5100 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
