In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i5-4258U is slightly slower than the FX-9370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4258U
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 28 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
FX-9370
- Up to 2% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 258 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 1 week newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 1 week newer
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i5-4258U vs FX-9370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4258U vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4258U vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4258U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4258U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM3+ |
28 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 5100 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
