Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i5-4250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3075 days newer than Core i5-4250U.
Advantages of Core i5-4250U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4250U - 130 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4250U - 24 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7204 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4250U | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |