In Atomfall, the Core i5-4200U is slower than the Core i9-11900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4200U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4200U vs Core i9-11900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4200U vs Core i9-11900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4200U vs Core i9-11900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4200U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
49%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4200U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $513.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
