In Atomfall, the Core i5-4200U is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4200U
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 193 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jun 04, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 15 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i3-330M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4200U vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
183 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
94%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4200U vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4200U vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4200U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4200U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGAG1 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
