In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3570K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3570K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3570K vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
70%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
71%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3570K vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3570K vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3570K Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$212.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
