In Atomfall, the Core i5-3570 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $443 cheaper!
Core i5-3570
- Up to 79% cheaper – $119.95 vs $563.41
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall – $0.62 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3570 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3570
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
77%
Price, $
$119.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
21%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3570 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3570 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3570
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3570 Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$194.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
