In Atomfall, the Core i5-3570 is slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $167 cheaper!
Core i5-3570
- Up to 58% cheaper – $119.95 vs $286.95
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 48% better value in Atomfall – $0.62 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 48% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 77 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3570 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3570
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
81%
Price, $
$119.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$286.95
41%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
52%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3570 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3570 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3570
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3570 Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$194.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
