Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3550S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3476 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Core i5-3550S
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $198.95 vs $269.95
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.86 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3550S - 258 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
231
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $198.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
82%
Price, $
$269.95
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3550S | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |