In Deathloop, the Core i5-3550 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3550
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 55 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-3550 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3550
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
91%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3550 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3550 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3550
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3550 Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $194.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 77W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
