In Atomfall, the Core i5-3475S is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3475S
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 251 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3475S vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$362
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3475S vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3475S vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3475S
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3475S Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
