In Control, the Core i5-3475S is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3475S
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 253 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-3475S vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3475S vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3475S vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3475S
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3475S Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
