In Rust, the Core i5-3470T is slightly slower than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 224 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-3470T vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3470T vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3470T vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3470T
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3470T Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
