In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-3470 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-1680 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3470
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 77 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Up to 13% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 120 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 4 years and 19 days newer – Jun 20, 2016 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 4 years and 19 days newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-3470 vs Xeon E5-1680 v4: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
106 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
85%
Price, $
$68.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3470 vs Xeon E5-1680 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3470 vs Xeon E5-1680 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3470 Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1680 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$184.00 | MSRP | $1,723.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
