In Atomfall, the Core i5-3470 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3470
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 77 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3470 vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
77%
Price, $
$68.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3470 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3470 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3470 Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$184.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
