In Deathloop, the Core i5-3450 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3450
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Apr 29, 2012 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 77 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-3450 vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
98%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3450 vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3450 vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3450 Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $174.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1366 |
77W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
