Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Core i5-3450
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $95.00 vs $744.95
- Up to 71% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.37 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 77 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 127% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3450 - 579 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7075 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
29%
Price, $
$744.95
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $744.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7075 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |