In Atomfall, the Core i5-3450 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $135 cheaper!
Core i5-3450
- Up to 59% cheaper – $95.00 vs $229.89
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $0.93/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 77 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 12 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3450 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
78%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
41%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3450 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3450 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
6 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3450 Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$174.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
