In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-3450 is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M, it's also the same value for money, as it's only $4 cheaper!
Core i5-3450
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Apr 29, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 4% cheaper – $95.00 vs $98.95
- Up to 4% cheaper
Core i3-330M
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 250 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-3450 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
239 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
96%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3450 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3450 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3450 Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $174.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
