Core i5-3427U vs Core i3-10105F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-3427U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-3427U
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
182
89%
Min 1% FPS
126
91%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$45.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3427U vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3427U vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3427U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
64%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3427U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
