Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i5-3380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2751 days newer than Core i5-3380M.
Advantages of Core i5-3380M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-3380M - 428 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3380M - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
428
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$925
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $925 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3380M | vs | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |