In Control, the Core i5-3360M is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3360M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-3360M vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3360M vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3360M vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3360M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3360M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
