In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3360M is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-8700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3360M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-8700K
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6 – 82 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3360M vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
82 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3360M vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3360M vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3360M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3360M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
