In Tom Clancy's The Division 2, the Core i5-3350P is much slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3350P
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 69 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 911% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – 91 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 911% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3350P vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3350P vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3350P vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3350P
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3350P Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
69W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
