In Atomfall, the Core i5-3340M is slightly faster than the Xeon E5530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 01, 2013 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5530
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5530: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5530
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5530 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $530.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
