In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-3340M is faster than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $509 cheaper!
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 90% cheaper – $54.04 vs $563.41
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.27 vs $3.31/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 12 years and 13 days newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 12 years and 13 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-3340M vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$563.41
9%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
8%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3340M vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3340M vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
61%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
