In Rust, the Core i5-3340M is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $66 cheaper!
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 55% cheaper – $54.04 vs $119.99
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Rust – $0.25 vs $0.53/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 226 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 6 days newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 6 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-3340M vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
75%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
45%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
47%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3340M vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3340M vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
83%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
