In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-3340M is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $45 cheaper!
Core i5-3340M
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Jan 01, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 45% cheaper – $54.04 vs $98.95
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 44% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.22 vs $0.39/FPS
- Up to 44% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i3-330M
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 249 vs 241 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-3340M vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
241 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
97%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
54%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
56%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3340M vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3340M vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
