Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Core i5-3330
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $99.00 vs $417.61
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.43 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3330 - 265 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
265
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
27%
Price, $
$417.61
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3330 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |