In Rust, the Core i5-3330 is same performance as the Core i3-330M. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $100 more expensive!
Core i5-3330
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Sep 03, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 50% cheaper – $98.95 vs $199.00
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Rust – $0.47 vs $0.95/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-3330 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
49%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
49%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
39 FPS
95%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3330 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3330 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3330 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
