In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-3320M is slightly faster than the FX-9590 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $217 cheaper!
Core i5-3320M
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 242 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 77% cheaper – $65.05 vs $282.02
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.26 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
FX-9590
- Is 1 year and 9 days newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 1 year and 9 days newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-3320M vs FX-9590: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
240 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
99%
Price, $
$282.02
23%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs FX-9590 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs FX-9590 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
66%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
