In Counter-Strike 2, the Core i5-3317U is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-13400T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i5-13400T
- Up to 53% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 356 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 53% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3317U vs Core i5-13400T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3317U vs Core i5-13400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3317U vs Core i5-13400T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3317U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
59%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3317U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400T Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $221.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
