In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i5-3230M is slightly faster than the Xeon W-2140B. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3230M
- Up to 5% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 260 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W-2140B
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Dec 21, 2017 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3230M vs Xeon W-2140B: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
260 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
195 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3230M vs Xeon W-2140B in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3230M vs Xeon W-2140B in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon W-2140B
Dec 21st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
11 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3230M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W-2140B Dec 21st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Dec 21st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
