The Core i5-3230M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-9900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Core i5-3230M vs Core i9-9900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
168
88%
Min 1% FPS
113
89%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$385
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
100%
Core i5-3230M vs Core i9-9900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3230M vs Core i9-9900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3230M vs Core i9-9900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-3230M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $488.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
