Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4155 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Core i5-3210M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 181% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-3210M - 205 vs 73 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 32 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$417.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3210M | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |