In Control, the Core i5-2557M is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2557M
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 17 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2011
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-2557M vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2557M vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2557M vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2557M
Jun 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2557M Jun 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2011 | Released | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | SP3r2 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
