In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-2557M is much slower than the Core i9-14900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2557M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Core i9-14900
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2011
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2557M vs Core i9-14900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2557M vs Core i9-14900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2557M vs Core i9-14900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2557M
Jun 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2557M Jun 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
