The Core i5-2557M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-2557M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i5-2557M vs Core i9-13900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-2557M
Jun 1st, 2011
Average FPS
166
77%
Min 1% FPS
112
79%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, $
$527.79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
100%
Core i5-2557M vs Core i9-13900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2557M vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2557M vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2557M
Jun 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
48%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-2557M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |