In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i5-2550K is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2689. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2550K
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 95 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 1% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 255 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 1 month and 5 days newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Jan 30, 2012
- Is 1 month and 5 days newer
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2550K vs Xeon E5-2689: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Average FPS
253 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
189 FPS
99%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2550K vs Xeon E5-2689 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2550K vs Xeon E5-2689 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2550K Jan 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 30th, 2012 | Released | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $235.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA2011 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
