In Atomfall, the Core i5-2550K is slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $475 cheaper!
Core i5-2550K
- Up to 86% cheaper – $74.25 vs $549.00
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall – $0.37 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 30, 2012
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2550K vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Average FPS
196 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
80%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
13%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2550K Jan 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 30th, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$235.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
