In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-2550K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2550K
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 30, 2012
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2550K vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Average FPS
63 FPS
70%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
69%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2550K Jan 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 30th, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$235.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
