In Atomfall, the Core i5-2550K is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2550K
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 194 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 22 days newer – Jan 30, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 22 days newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2550K vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2550K Jan 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 30th, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$235.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
