In Deathloop, the Core i5-2550K is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2550K
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400T
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 30, 2012
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-2550K vs Core i5-13400T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
97%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i5-13400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2550K vs Core i5-13400T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i5-13400T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2550K Jan 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400T Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 30th, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $235.00 | MSRP | $221.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
