In Atomfall, the Core i5-2540M is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2540M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Feb 01, 2011
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2540M vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2540M
Feb 1st, 2011
Average FPS
190 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
77%
Price, $
$65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2540M vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2540M vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2540M
Feb 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2540M Feb 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
