In Mass Effect: Andromeda, the Core i5-2500S is slightly faster than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $384 cheaper!
Core i5-2500S
- Up to 1% faster in Mass Effect: Andromeda – 943 vs 935 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Mass Effect: Andromeda
- Up to 83% cheaper – $79.72 vs $463.99
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Mass Effect: Andromeda – $0.08 vs $0.49/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Mass Effect: Andromeda
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
Mass Effect: Andromeda FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500S vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
943 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
525 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
935 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
511 FPS
97%
Price, $
$463.99
17%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500S vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500S vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
