In Atomfall, the Core i5-2500S is slightly slower than the Core i5-12400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $100 cheaper!
Core i5-2500S
- Up to 56% cheaper – $79.72 vs $179.99
- Up to 56% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 228 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500S vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
193 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
84%
Price, $
$79.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
44%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500S vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500S vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
